نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية
المؤلف
باحث الماجستير كلية الآداب – قسم الفلسفة – جامعة الكويت
المستخلص
عنوان المقالة [English]
المؤلف [English]
The current study aims to demonstrate the foundational link between the “ethical authority” of “philosophy of law” and other areas of philosophical theorizing and the “religious authority” in light of the perspectives of separation and separation in the spaces of philosophical theorizing.
The study also showed that the difference in dominance is represented by many reasons, including the tendency of separation and secularization, and the perception that is the dominance of mixing fixed and changing morals.. In his study, the researcher reached several results, including: the necessity of distinguishing between fixed and variable morals in an objective, scientific manner, to avoid hideous confusion on the one hand, and to clarify the essence of matters as they are, without affectation or interpretation.
Also, it is necessary to consider “ethics” as a reference for theorizing “philosophy of law” and limit it to fixed morals, which are relegated to the status of a living human being who has not changed with the change of past times.
Likewise, it is necessary to distinguish between the concept of “law” in the direct sense, and the concept of “philosophy of law,” and the necessity of directing a call to the mass of researchers to pay more attention to this topic, with the aim of deepening consideration of the origins and references of theorizing and to verify the extent of the presence of “moral reference” in theorizing of “philosophy.” “Law” and to make the effort focused on identifying the totality of available possibilities provided by the “moral reference.”