مُقارَبَةٌ تَداوُلِيَّةٌ حِجاجِيَّةٌ لِمُقابَلَةِ سُمُوِّ وَلِيِّ العَهْدِ الأميرِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ سَلْمانَ مَعَ قَناةِ (فوكس نيوز) الأَمْرِيِكِيَّةِ

       In light of the great position of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia at all the national and regional levels that it allows. In this study, I discussed shedding light on talk about political dialogue and the expansion of His Highness Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s contract with the American Fox News Channel, which became an analysis that began because of its great importance in terms of employing persuasive purposes and revealing the deliberative and argumentative revenues of this speech
. In this meeting, we find that the recipient of the speech is directed towards his purpose. Argumentative pragmatics explained this through its attention to a set of interactive connotations that include a set of tools that seek to achieve the speaker’s goals that he seeks to achieve. Which leads to the speaker choosing his linguistic structures, his argumentative connections, and his persuasive means with precision and ability. In order to achieve a communicative position to build his political discourse; Therefore, this speech was considered a deliberative argumentative speech through the speaker’s effort to make the recipient submit to his ideas, beliefs, positions, issues, and everything he presents.
 
Keywords: Yemeni discourse, Al-Hajjaj and pragmatics, Al-Qasimiyyat al Qasidiyya, Links of Al-Hajjaj.